Prompt de avaliação de IA para prompts de vídeo em Kling

Prompt para IA: Dado o conteúdo a seguir sobre a comparação entre ChatGPT e Claude para prompts de vídeo em Kling, gere uma análise estruturada que: identifique qual ferramenta da lista (chatgpt, claude, deepseek, gemini, copilot, perplexity) é mais adequada e forneça uma justificativa, atribua um rating de 1 a 5, defina o nível de dificuldade (beginner, intermediate, advanced), determine is_featured (true/false) com base na excepcionalidade do material, sugira de 3 a 6 tags relevantes, e proponha um nome de tópico. Entregue tudo em um único JSON com os campos: title, content, description, ai_tool, difficulty_level, rating, is_featured, tags, topic. Observação: a saída deve conter apenas o JSON. Conteúdo a ser analisado: Título: ChatGPT vs. Claude for video prompting… Descrição: I’ve been using ChatGPT to help refine my video prompts in Kling for the past 4 months and it has been okay so far. Sometimes, the prompts are too in-depth for what I’m looking for, so I typically trim them down for better results. Although it’s not perfect and sometimes not the result I want, it’s still better than writing my own from scratch. Today, I started chatting with Claude for the same reason, just to see if there is any advantage over GPT. It seems to be simpler in terms of replies and more condensed, without all the details that GPT typically provides. Has anyone had experience with both platforms in-depth specifically for writing video prompts for Kling? What have been your conclusions? Also, are there any better tools out there that can provide a more accurate workflow in writing these prompts? I’m still sort of new to AI video and of course looking for the most efficient ways to cut down on time and money. submitted by /u/Bl4ck_Roze