Análise de moderação de comunidades online diante de brigading e políticas de acesso

Prompt de análise para moderação de comunidades online diante de brigading e políticas de acesso. Dado o conteúdo de referência a seguir, gere uma análise prática para moderadores sobre como lidar com brigading, visibilidade de posts e propostas de governança de acesso: Conteúdo de referência: Título: To the mods Descrição: It’s a rough day today for anyone who has used 4o. I thank the mods for being supportive and for creating a community where we can speak out. But in the wake of ChatGPT’s popularity and 4o’s criticism, there has been constant brigading of this sub. From r/antiAI and r/cogsuckers and even from r/ChatGPT. I can’t say how many times l’ve seen a post on the main sub about being upset about losing 4o or 4.1 and see comments calling them crazy and to “check r/MyBoyfriendIsAI for more craziness.” Our level of popularity is so high that even journalists are copy & pasting posts from here to further the viewpoint that we are mentally ill. For example this Guardian piece: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/ng-interactive/2026/feb/13/openai-chatbot-gpt4o-valentines-day The vetting of journalists doesn’t matter if ones with bad intentions can just get what they need from this community. I propose that the mods look into only allowing verified users to view the sub (as of